Search for: "Public Citizen v. US Trade Representative"
Results 21 - 40
of 523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
FOIA is premised upon a wholly different principle, that government records should be accessible to any member of the public, i.e., the public at large, without any showing of need.[5] Thus, at its core, FOIA effectuates “the abstract public interest in open government. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 6:15 am
We are leading the charge against undemocratic trade agreements that advance the interests of mega-corporations at the expense of citizens worldwide. * * * Public Citizen is a nonprofit organization that does not participate in partisan political activities or endorse any candidates for elected office. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:23 am
So: public employees have free speech rights, just not as extensive as those of citizens. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:22 pm
In S.E.C. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am
The country’s most recent constitution, which was ratified by referendum in 1999, added two new governmental branches: (i) the citizen power; and (ii) the electoral power. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am
Participation used where a revolving facility is traded or new funding is required but there is a risk of banking licence “look through”. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
The new law recognizes that certain non-compete and conflict-of-interest clauses violate Maryland’s public policy and are therefore null and void. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
Trade Representative's (USTR) Trade Advisory Committees, or their equivalent advisory processes in other countries (we wrote more about this for last year's Copyright Week). [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm
This case arose when CompTel, a trade industry group that represents some of AT&T’s competitors, filed a FOIA request for FCC records relating to that agency’s investigation of AT&T. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Representative Davis also worried that trade associations could be hurt if companies stopped paying dues to these organizations as a result of the Raskin amendment. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 7:53 pm
Nickolas filed suit and, represented by Public Citizen, raised two primary arguments that the policy was unconstitutional under the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 11:02 am
If this sounds familiar, it should: the Court used similar reasoning in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Representatives Coble (R-NC) and Quayle were also in attendance. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
(The authors are not representing someone accused of a crime, though.) [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
Debonneville v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm
Texas badly needs stronger protection for property rights, since it has a long history of eminent domain abuse, including recent examples documented by the Institute for Justice (the libertarian public interest firm that represented the property owners in Kelo) in this report. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 7:24 pm
Praveen Raj filed the rectification application as a person who represented public interest. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
Ifwe want public authorities, private institutions and citizens to adopt certain behaviourswhich are crucial to fight climate change, we ultimately have to make use of sanctionedrules.That said, it is worth asking how, and by what means, law is likely to influence socialactions, public or private, that contribute to global warming or, on the contrary, curb it.This question essentially targets both goals and methods: what the law can achieve andthrough which… [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 2:05 pm
A trade association representing service providers at LAX had standing to challenge the city’s actions, the appeals court determined. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
Defenders of Wildlife (1992)).Like members of the public, members of Congress, too, have a “public interest in proper administration of the laws,” Lujan, but that interest isn’t any different from the “generalized interest of all citizens in constitutional governance”--an interest that’s insufficient to support Article III standing when the Executive is alleged to have acted unlawfully, or ultra vires. [read post]
