Search for: "Richard J. Simmons" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's Stay Motion is in Re: Richard Allenv. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
"  The 1709 Blog hosts Professor Paul J. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Calder L, Simmons G, Thornley C, Taylor P, Pritchard K, Greening G, Bishop J. (2003). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
HR managers must be sensitive to and investigate discrimination claims reasonably before making decisions or taking action. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Published: Richard Murphy, Administrative Law and Practice – 3 Admin. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
 More here and a September article on the IPKat by Marie-Andree Weiss here and on Art & Artifice here.The Oscars are out so a couple of film updates to finish: Director Dan Gilroy, Bold Films, Open Road Films and NBC Universal Media have been accused of copyright infringement amid allegations that the plot of the Oscar-nominated movie 'Nightcrawler' was lifted from a film by a Utah filmmaker Richard Dutcher. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 2:15 pm
at 4,9; Document No. 22 at 1; McNair, 515 F .3d at 1179 (Wilson, J. dissenting). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
  Reference can also be made to California’s Sick Pay Obligations – The Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, a publication authored by Attorney Richard J. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
After all of the complicated arguments in the wage/penalty debate, future points and authorities regarding the issue can now be boiled down to a single sentence and citation: The "additional hour of pay" due to an employee under Labor Code § 226.7 is a wage, not a penalty. [read post]