Search for: "Robert A. West v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 11:05 am
Today West Virginia Governor Bob Manchin announced the state is suing EPA over mountaintop mining restrictions (Huffman v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:13 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Nokia OYJ (Nokia Corporation) v IPCom GmbH & Co Kg [2012] EWCA Civ 567 (10 May 2012) Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports [2012] EWCA Civ 596 (10 May 2012) PHI Group Ltd v Robert West Consulting Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 588 (10 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) LK (Somalia)), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1229 (Admin) (10… [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization), does not repudiate Meyer and Pierce so much as complete the recasting of their concerns (together with those of West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:49 am by nflatow
For example, the Roberts’ Court presumed workers’ acquiescence in a union-employer agreement to waive employees’ right to a jury trial in a Title VII case. 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Alexander, Evidence in New York State and Federal Courts § 4:6 at 4-158 West NY Prac Series Vol 5m 2016. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Alexander, Evidence in New York State and Federal Courts § 4:6 at 4-158 West NY Prac Series Vol 5m 2016. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Alexander, Evidence in New York State and Federal Courts § 4:6 at 4-158 West NY Prac Series Vol 5m 2016. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:04 pm
Alexander, Evidence in New York State and Federal Courts § 4:6 at 4-158 West NY Prac Series Vol 5m 2016. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
The bad news for the friends of federalism is that the 4-4 decision was likely the result of Chief Justice Roberts' recusal: It is difficult to believe that Roberts who joined Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Gonzales v Oregon, would tolerate state tort claims rooted in the allegation that a manufacturer committed fraud against the FDA. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
§47.01(4)(A) (West 2011); see also §47.02(a)(3) (West Supp. 2021). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:59 am by Native American Rights Fund
Robert McKenna, Attorney General of Washington  (Indian Treaty Interpretation) on 3/09/15. * United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2015dct.htmlMassachusetts v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
In West Virginia v EPA, Chief Justice Roberts explained this limit as follows while invalidating an important environmental regulation the EPA was considering: In certain extraordinary cases, both separation of powers principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent make us reluctant to read into ambiguous statutory text the delegation claimed to be lurking there. [read post]