Search for: "STATE EMPLOYEES v. Personnel Bd." Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Clearly this is counter production, especially in a layoff situation where the abolishment of positions usually undertaken to reduce the employer’s personnel service costs.[22] The selection of individuals for appointment to positions in the several jurisdictional classes of positions in the classified service -- the competitive class, the non-competitive class, the exempt class and the labor class – reflect the requirements of Article V, §6 of the New York… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:01 am by Julia Riechert
For employers who employ first responders, medical personnel, and certain personnel who work at health care facilities, the statute provides that any one of these employees who tests positive for COVID-19 on or after July 6, 2020, is entitled to a presumption that illness or death resulting from COVID-19 arose in the course of his or her employment, as long as the employee tests positive for COVID-19 within 14 days of working at his or her place of employment.[14]… [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
(see CPLR 217[1]; see also Matter of Biondo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 60 NY2d 832, 834 [1983]). [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
" Here, said the court, CSEA established that it pursued the avenues available to assist Delsante in her grievance but because of her probationary status, the options were limited pursuant to the CSEA Collective Bargaining Agreement Article §33.1 which specifically states "[t]he disciplinary procedure provided herein is not applicable to review the removal of an employee from a probationary appointment".Significantly, CSEA demonstrated that its representative… [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[PBA], as the exclusive bargaining representative for certain employees in a negotiating unit, and the State of New York [Petitioner] had entered into a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] covering unit personnel that included contract articles addressing winter work schedules, summer work schedules and, as pertinent here, provisions concerning seniority and vacancies, modifying unit members' shifts, and contract grievance procedures. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[PBA], as the exclusive bargaining representative for certain employees in a negotiating unit, and the State of New York [Petitioner] had entered into a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] covering unit personnel that included contract articles addressing winter work schedules, summer work schedules and, as pertinent here, provisions concerning seniority and vacancies, modifying unit members' shifts, and contract grievance procedures. [read post]