Search for: "Simmons v. Simmons (Complete Opinion)" Results 21 - 40 of 81
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
Cross-examination is important to keep experts on the straight and narrow and provide a check on the extreme statements that can sometimes be seen in written opinions, a process likened to a PhD candidate being called upon to defend their doctoral thesis at a viva. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:31 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Simmons (2005), Kennedy wrote the opinion in a 5-4 decision declaring the death penalty unconstitutional when imposed for crimes committed by juveniles. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
After the government lost Simmons, Hernández was relisted again. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Former Guest Kat Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons, London) explains.* BREAKING: AG Szpunar says that fair compensation for private copying can be funded through state budget but amount cannot be established ex anteEleonora reports on Advocate General Maciej Szpunar's Opinion in EGEDA C-470/14 [here], a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Spanish Supreme Court seeking clarification as to whether private copying can be public-funded… [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
” And Simmons v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:51 am by Florian Mueller
" (emphasis added) The Federal Circuit said so in its mid-2013 Fresenius decision and based this holding on "[t]he Supreme Court's decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]