Search for: "Smithkline Beecham Pharmaceutical Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 538 F. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:08 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. regarding the scope of this exemption has provided much needed clarity to pharmaceutical companies and employers with similar types of sales forces who have relied – and hope to continue to rely – on the exemption. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
Miller Rubber Co. of N. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corporation that pharmaceutical sales representatives are not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:36 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:17 pm
SmithKline Beecham deference-to-agency-amicus-briefs fray argued and pending decision before the Supreme Court and resolving an interdistrict conflict. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311-12 (5th Cir. 1989)(“Fortunately, we do not have to resolve any of the above questions [as to bias and confounding], since the studies presented to us incorporate the possibility of these factors by the use of a confidence interval. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2010 U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a case which may lead the Court to revisit whether an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations merit deference. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
KV Pharmaceutical Co., 2011 WL 6257466 (E.D. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. in which the Court will consider whether the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside sales exemption” applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp.Docket: 11-204Issue(s): (1) Whether deference is owed to the Secretary of Labor's interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption and related regulations; and (2) whether the Fair Labor Standards Act's outside sales exemption applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:40 am
See SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 658 N.W.2d 127 (Mich. 2003)) or the Sixth Circuit (Garcia v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2009 WL 1456723, at *1-2 (D. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Cir. 2006) (en banc in part) SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp.pdf, __F.3d___, 2011 WL 489708 (9thCir. [read post]
