Search for: "State v. Ferro"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Ferro, 252 F.3d 964 (U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 6:26 am
§ 42.8(b)(2), Petitioner states that the ’685 patent is the subject of several matters that may affect, or may be affected by a decision in this proceeding: Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am
Tooey v. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:43 pm
Folta v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Susana Sanchez Ferro considered the implications for domestic intelligence services of the increasing necessity of global intelligence initiatives. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:41 pm
Ferro and the case of People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:02 pm
Ferro and the case of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:10 am
In California, a recent Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel opinion imposed the maximum statutory penalty against a carrier for what it said was an unreasonable delay in the approval of psychotropic medications for an injured worker.In Ferro v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 12:56 pm
” Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 12:12 pm
Ferro and GEICO, No. 109 - 2010 - Civil (Pike Co. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:54 pm
” State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
USA v Romero-Padilla. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:16 am
Ferro
APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTGovernment
Response to FOIL Request for Papers on Senate Employee Did Not Satisfy Statute, Senate Rule
Matter of Polokoff-Zakarin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
This is the third in the four-part series from the brain injury case of Gregory Joseph Gagnon, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 9:14 am
Cash indisputably plays a significant role as circumstantial evidence in narcotics cases (citations omitted), however, and we conclude that 'an objective observer with the same knowledge concerning the suspect as the police had would conclude that the [question of the narcotics officer concerning the ownership of cash found in the kitchen during the execution of the search warrant] was reasonably likely to elicit [an incriminating] response' (People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316,… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
