Search for: "State v. Hollister" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am by Rick E. Rayl
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 1:57 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Vincent L. DiTommaso
 We are currently litigating the issue in an appeal in New Jersey state court against Abercrombie’s sister company Hollister. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:54 pm by Matt Osenga
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
 Around this time last year he found himself in the Court of Appeal in  Hollister Inc v Medik Ostomy Supplies Ltd - an account of profits case that reversed His Honour Judge Birss QC's (as he then was) decision (see AmeriKat's report on the appeal here). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm by Jamie C. Chanin
State of California, 18 Cal.3d 808, 814 (1977) (specifying retirement benefits are deemed part of a compensation package and may only be conferred by board action); County of Riverside v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]