Search for: "State v. Monaghan" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2016, 8:10 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Monaghan Creating Parody Social Media Accounts Doesn’t Violate Computer Fraud & Abuse Act – Matot v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Here are the main highlights: Points of interest There was an interesting article discussing the recent report published by Sir Geoffery Bindman QC and Karon Monaghan QC called Judicial Diversity: Accelerating Change. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 3:43 am
Oregon, and its impending decision in the fascinating case of Medellin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the breach of fiduciary duty causes of action, “where an allegation of fraud is essential to a breach of fiduciary duty claim, courts have applied a six-year statute of limitations under CPLR 213 (8)” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009], rearg denied 12 NY3d 889 [2009]; see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848, 849-850 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
They and the NGO interveners were represented throughout by leading, all-women, legal teams, which included two partners, Harriet Wistrich and Sarah Ricca, as well as two silks, Phillippa Kaufmann QC and Karon Monaghan QC. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"However, this broad discretion is not 'unlimited'" (Matter of Lake v Town of Southold, 189 AD3d 1588, 1591, quoting Matter of Maynard v Monaghan, 284 App Div 280, 283). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"However, this broad discretion is not 'unlimited'" (Matter of Lake v Town of Southold, 189 AD3d 1588, 1591, quoting Matter of Maynard v Monaghan, 284 App Div 280, 283). [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
” Almost two decades earlier, Henry Monaghan likewise confidently stated that “a litigant asserts his own rights (not those of a third person) when he seeks to void restrictions that directly impair his freedom to interact with a third person. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:54 am by Eric Goldman
Monaghan Trademark Owner Sues Over Alleged Twittersquatting–Coventry First, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v Wong, 2012 ONCA 432, indicated that this definition equally applies to s. 95 of the Criminal Code. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:11 am by New Books Script
KF 385 ZC2 D57 2012 Dissenting judgments in the law / edited by Neal Geach and Christopher Monaghan. [read post]