Search for: "State v. Schlesinger "
Results 21 - 40
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2012, 7:32 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
Buckley and how civil rights lawyers attacked the state action requirement in Shelley v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:26 am
” State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Cantore v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
Cf Schlesinger v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:06 am
Carasco v Schlesinger 2022 NY Slip Op 33021(U) September 8, 2022. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:47 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
Wells and Noel v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:10 am
” See Energy Reserves Group v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:51 am
In Mensh v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am
Hirsch v Walder, 201 AD3d 467, 467; Warshaw Burstein Cohen Schlesinger & Kuh, LLP v Longmire, 106 AD3d 536, 537). [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
In June 2012, two journalists from The Times, Mr Alexi Mostrous and Ms Fay Schlesinger, approached HMRC for an “off the record” discussion relating to tax avoidance to inform their background investigations for a proposed article. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
Schlesinger, was very familiar with Elektra v. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
Cohen, supra; Schlesinger v. [read post]