Search for: "State v. Schlesinger " Results 21 - 40 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Buckley and how civil rights lawyers attacked the state action requirement in Shelley v. [read post]
THE
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am by CAPTAIN
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:10 am
” See Energy Reserves Group v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hirsch v Walder, 201 AD3d 467, 467; Warshaw Burstein Cohen Schlesinger & Kuh, LLP v Longmire, 106 AD3d 536, 537). [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
In June 2012, two journalists from The Times, Mr Alexi Mostrous and Ms Fay Schlesinger, approached HMRC for an “off the record” discussion relating to tax avoidance to inform their background investigations for a proposed article. [read post]