Search for: "State v. Sitting Crow" Results 21 - 40 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Crow also bought three properties belonging to Thomas worth over $100,000 that Thomas never disclosed. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am by Smita Ghosh
” Which sitting president might evince the timelessness of this challenge? [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Murray was the only woman in her law school class, and she became aware of sexism at the school, which she labeled “Jane Crow” — alluding to Jim Crow, the system of racial discriminatory state laws oppressing African Americans. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Snapping a remarkable winning streak for plaintiffs challenging state bans, Feldman’s ruling was the first decision by a federal court upholding a state SSM ban since the Supreme Court invalidated Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 10:19 am by Josh Blackman
For example, Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
The experience led Murray to coin the term “Jane Crow,” similar to Jim Crow but focused on the inherent misogynoir of segregation. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
Waskow, From Race Riot to Sit-In (1966); Herbert Aptheker’s Negro Slave Revolts (1943). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
  Whatever damage candidate Trump could have done to American democracy had he lost in November would pale in comparison to the damage wrought by a sitting president rejecting his defeat. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am by Rick Houghton
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]