Search for: "Thomas Bush, III"
Results 21 - 40
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am
Thomas Eagleton, for example, submitted a lengthy joint statement in which they charged that OLC was “misinformed” as to congressional intent, whi [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:45 pm
” Stressing that the case “presents questions about the right of public access to Article III judicial proceedings of grave national importance,” but also about “the power of this Court to review the work of Article III judges in a subordinate court,” Gorsuch asked, “If these matters are not worthy of our time, what is? [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
Bush administration. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:27 am
Part III-B of Regents begins on p. 17. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:06 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Lloyd Austin III, defense secretary, and Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:30 am
The reason is relatively simple: As a “defense intellectual,” immersed at the time in the work of Thomas Schelling and other rationalistic game theorists, I “knew” that the event was something of a charade conducted between leaders of the two great powers, both of whom realized that it was literally insane to engage in a nuclear exchange (or, perhaps, any other armed conflict); this meant that we were observing a kind of Kabuki theater. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
” (In this regard we note that in another Article III setting, that of standing, the Court has said that the fact that perhaps no one has standing to raise a particular claim is not a reason to disregard the Article III requirement of standing.)But why exactly will the independent-state-legislature theory issue evade review by the Supreme Court? [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
However, recently justices (e.g., Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Alito) have suggested that the Court lacks that discretion when States invoking the Court's original jurisdiction have no other judicial forum available to adjudicate their claims. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
However, recently justices (e.g., Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Alito) have suggested that the Court lacks that discretion when States invoking the Court's original jurisdiction have no other judicial forum available to adjudicate their claims. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
See Bush, 531 U.S. at 112 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring, with Scalia, J. and Thomas, J.) [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
See, e.g., Bush v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Justices Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm
Jeb Bush. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:11 pm
Bush, and the four liberals were on one side, against the other four conservative justices. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Now, Part III turns to Justice Kavanaugh. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
” Justice Clarence Thomas in a concurring opinion offered a more detailed account of the history of the habeas writ and the Suspension Clause. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Richard Lazarus in connection with Lazarus’ new book, “The Rule of Five: Making Climate History at the Supreme Court” (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2020). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Judge Thomas Griffith wrote for the court, with Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson concurring. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
In the McGahn oral argument, Judge Thomas Griffith, an appointee of George W. [read post]
