Search for: "Thomas M. Powers"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
To be sure, such a person might also have been aware that states at the time exercised the lawful power to do just that—i.e., to assess penalties for defamatory speech of public figures, sometimes even when the speech was truthful. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
You’d have to be a superbly skilled journalist, someone like Janet Malcolm, who I’m not, to get Thomas to break out of his script. [read post]
10 Apr 2006, 8:00 am
New London, a case from the 2004-2005 Supreme Court term, has caused continuing controversy surrounding the government's use of eminent domain powers and is the subject of the Fourth Annual John M. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:03 pm
As I’m prepping to teach the commerce clause in a couple of weeks and re-reading the cases, I’m struck by how virtually impossible it will be for Justice Thomas to remain consistent to his past opinions and uphold the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 that is presently before the Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 1:28 am
"Find out how I'm doing, what I'm up to, that's about it. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 5:23 am
Thomas M. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Thomas M. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 12:20 pm
In April 2018, the Georgetown Center for the Constitution awarded its first Thomas M. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 9:26 am
In doing research for a short symposium piece I'm writing on Justice Thomas and student free speech rights -- namely, his concurrence in Morse v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am
It is a hideous place as far as I’m concerned. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
Smiling Andrew Thomas I’m no fan of Andrew Thomas. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 9:01 am
A review of David M. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In answering Justice Thomas, SG Prelogar said precedents establish that Congress may use the Spending Clause power to preempt state law, even when the recipients of the federal funds are private parties rather than the state itself. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:00 am
We lawbloggers -- yeah, sometimes I'm a lawblogger, when the Spirit of the Laws moves me -- really would love to talk about this Stanley Fish piece. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:39 am
I’m not 89. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:34 pm
I realize the committee may need to follow another route to compel his answers, and I’m prepared to make that happen. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 5:14 am
I'm in the midst of writing a series of articles that explain why. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:09 pm
Nikolas M. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:47 pm
I'm picturing the movie version of "My Grandfather's Son. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Breyer, Elena Kagan, and Anthony M. [read post]
