Search for: "U.S. v. Parris"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2019, 3:48 pm
Lee and SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
” He parried with, “What Disclaimer? [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
” He parried with, “What Disclaimer? [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 2:06 pm
The Supreme Court showed no great interest in the bankruptcy problem at the heart of Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
See 338 U.S. at 542–43. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm
As we enter the courtroom for today’s argument in Christie v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:33 am
For the Associated Press, Wayne Parry previews Christie v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am
In an interesting examination of the role of social media platforms and terrorism, the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2017, 8:34 am
To support his claim, Jawad begins by citing Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 5:41 pm
Justice Elena Kagan intervened, arguing that the court’s decision in Kloeckner v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm
This year’s case file, Parry v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
James highlighted the case of DuPont v Kolon - which concerned the Kevlar trade secrets (read about the case here in the testimony from Karen Cochran) - and recent cases concerning Chinese espionage (US v Xu and Zi, US v Xi and US v Chen) as examples of criminal trade secrets prosecution. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Yet ALDF v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:07 pm
ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Carvin parried that if one was looking for information about who should get a tax credit (the form of the subsidy at issue), then the natural place to look would be in the tax code, and not in the title of the U.S. code relating to public health and exchanges. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:26 pm
Bucklew v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:10 pm
Of course that conflicts with, among other things, the Supreme Court’s Gregg v. [read post]
