Search for: "US Ex Rel. Doe v. X Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Petrotech Resources Corp., 325 S.W.3d 302, 313 (Ky. 2010); Balboa Island Village Inn, 156 P.3d at 352 (Cal.); Sid Dillon Chevrolet v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
What's more, "the United States Supreme Court has barred any use of the sixth factor and advised that the second factor generally cannot be used as a ground for enhancing the award. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 5:15 pm
An alternative approach that avoids these problems is the one developed by Judge James Robart in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
[x] The court found that to hold otherwise would risk disrupting the physician-patient relationship and could cause physicians to make overly harsh decisions regarding impairment limitations. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  However, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s conclusion that, whatever public rights exist under section 4 (that issue was not decided), do not override the federal land patent title in the Owner in light of Summa Corp. ex rel. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
  Indeed, the Second Circuit reviewed that decision and held that the FLSA does not preclude class waivers. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:47 pm
Jan. 13, 2010) (observing that Wikipedia "touts its own unreliability"); Campbell ex rel. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
  If the jury does not hear the bases of the opinion, it cannot meaningfully evaluate the opinion. [read post]