Search for: "US v. Cano" Results 21 - 40 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2010, 1:15 pm by WIMS
In particular, Sierra Club claimed that the Forest Service had failed to consider the plan's effects on the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:10 am by David Canton
Black v Breedan tells us that – at least in Ontario – libel tourists are not welcome. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:44 am by David Canton
The recent United Kingdom court decision of Red Sky v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:33 am
In this case involving the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act, Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club North Star Chapter, and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness (collectively Wilderness Watch) brought suit against Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service, and Ed Schafer, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (collectively Forest Service), alleging that the Forest Service's decision to construct a certain snowmobile trail between McFarland Lake… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:37 am by David Canton
In the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision, Tucows.Com Co v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm by NARF
Patuxent Facility (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html North Dakota v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Supp. 740, 785, 836 (E.D.N.Y. 1984) (“A government administrative agency may regulate or prohibit the use of toxic substances through rulemaking, despite a very low probability of any causal relationship. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:51 am by Derek T. Muller
I published this blog's first post on March 19, 2013, a critique of the theater of oral argument in Shelby County v. [read post]