Search for: "United States v. Consolidated Edison Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2009, 12:37 am
Consolidated Edison of New YorkU.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
See id. at 513 ("'The First Amendment's hostility to content-based regulation extends not only to restrictions of particular viewpoints, but also to prohibition of public discussion of an entire topic.'") (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:43 am
Consolidated Edison is cited:We review the Board’s legal determinations de novo,In re Elsner, 381 F.3d 1125, 1127 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509, 514 (1991)(the risk of stepping in a bucket of oil is not a gravity-related risk and thus not protected against by the statute) Van Amerogen v Donnini, 78 N.Y.2d 880, 880 (1991)( “The [one- or two-family dwelling] exception may be extended only so far as statutory language warrants, and all doubts should be resolved in favor of statute's general provision rather than exception”). [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Rohm & Haas Co., 2 F.3d 1265 (3d Cir. 1993), with Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 10:44 am
Rohm & Haas Co., 2 F.3d 1265 (3d Cir. 1993), with Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
It also had six business units located in the state. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
” Similarly, Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 8:34 am
The New York Court of Appeals disagreed, finding in reliance on Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
” Best v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:18 am
In Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
In the seminal case, Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
” Consolidated Edison Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:37 am
In Williams v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
" Consolidated Edison Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
The “FDA is a regulatory agency whose mandate is to control which drugs are marketed in the United States and how they are marketed. [read post]
