Search for: "United States v. Gregory Davis"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
In the following guest post, Gregory A. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:58 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:39 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Gregory The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
In other news… United States Reuters reports that the United States is open to the possibility of joint FON patrols with the Philippines in the South China Sea. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
But we query whether, in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules, including that announced in 1991 in Gregory v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am
The United States, at the time, characterized that seizure as “unlawful. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
“These statements,” Judge Gregory writes, “suggest that like EO-1, EO-2’s purpose is to effectuate the promised Muslim ban, and that its changes from EO-1 reflect an effort to help it survive judicial scrutiny, rather than to avoid targeting Muslims for exclusion from the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
United States, which asks whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:40 pm
DAVIS. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
But, as the battle for Tikrit ramps up, the Wall Street Journal reports that the United States is walking back its plan to retake Mosul in April. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 12:00 am
Perhaps unsurprisingly, a federal court sent his hostile work environment claim under Title VII to trial (Davis v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 9:02 am
The Fourth Circuit yesterday issued an en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
The Fourth Circuit yesterday issued an en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
