Search for: "United States v. McClure" Results 21 - 40 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2020, 10:43 am by Leslie Griffin
One of the agencies, Catholic Social Services, sued, arguing that it has a free exercise right to do business with the city while continuing to discriminate against same-sex couples, whose marriage rights are protected by the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm by David Kopel
" The Washington Post reports that a state sponsor of terrorism is already attempting to obtain these guns. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
All concede that the cap Eckhardt wore represented a symbol responding to tasteless commentary about women uttered by a United States President. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is perhaps ironic that Wigmore has had far more staying power in Canada than in his home country, the United States. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
 In this plantworker case, I represented Carey-Canada in what turned out to be one of its last cases in the United States, before filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
It believes that “the primary legal materials of the United States are the raw materials of our democracy. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]