Search for: "United States v. Swift & Company"
Results 21 - 40
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Our thoughts are with the injured driver, and we hope for a swift recovery. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
To a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:56 am
"A few days ago, Qualcomm's stock hit $70 for the first time in three years.It's just that all this good news is in stark contrast to what Qualcomm's lead counsel, Cravath's Evan Chesler, told Judge Gonzalo Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California about a year ago when Qualcomm was seeking a preliminary injunction requiring four Apple contract manufacturers to make royalty payments prior to a final ruling on the… [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
(2) Whether, if the petition is not granted prior to September 25, 2007 -- when Pfizer's pediatric exclusivity for Norvasc comes to an end -- the Court should instead grant the petition and order the Court of Appeals' judgment vacated under United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night – and certainly not a batch of freezing rain and ice that’s currently paralyzing the greater Baltimore-Washington area right now – stays your trusty editors from the swift completion of their appointed rounds; namely, bringing you the weekly roundup of Suits by Suits: It may not make the headlines on cable news channels, but next Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States… [read post]
9 May 2024, 12:38 pm
In the United States, for example, the First Amendment guarantees that platforms generally have the right to decide what content they will host, and their users have a corollary right to receive it. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 7:59 am
In May 2023, the United Kingdom Supreme Court in Jalla v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:42 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:56 am
In the United States District Court, Southwestern District, Tempe, Arizona Case No. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Cal. 2012); Swift Transp. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
.* Random thoughts on Ms Swift's "sick" trade marksTaylor Swift has filed a number of marks seeking protection for lines or quotes of lyrics from songs or song titles of her most recent album 1989. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:51 am
See, e.g., LaMorte Burns & Co. v. [read post]