Search for: "Washington v. Slater" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Barnett at Gun-Rights Showdown, who writes:"Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Heller v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Supreme Court will almost certainly extend the scope of the Second Amendment right to bear arms to limit state and federal regulation of firearms, based on oral arguments today in McDonald v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
New Zealand The trial of the libel claim by the former Conservative leader Colin Craig against the blogger Cameron Slater, Whaleoil, continues. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 5:04 am by INFORRM
In the Law Times David Slater analyses the state of defamation was, using the spate of Trump 2020 election fraud claims as an example. [read post]
In the case of Naruto v Slater, where a monkey ran off with an individual’s camera and took a plethora of selfies, it was concluded that the monkey did not have protections over the selfies because copyright does not extend to animals or nonhumans. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany,  heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Bukovsky v CPS, heard 5 October 2017 (Gross, Si [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
” At Mayer Brown’s Consumer Financial Services Review, Brian Netter analyzes the Court’s decision in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
Slater-Chandler) and Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia’s Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases (review by R. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2016, HHJ Moloney QC heard applications in the cases of Ghuman v Ghuman and Hussain v Feeney. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Regulatory Analysis October 12, 2023 | Joseph Cordes, Susan Dudley and Clark Nardinelli, George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center; Donald S. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(One managing partner recounted being faced with a near insurrection among half a dozen partners when he had the temerity to relocate their Washington, DC office by all of one short city block. [read post]