Search for: "Wells v 3M Co." Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2016, 5:16 am by Schachtman
Politics and occupational disease litigation are like that. [1] See In re All Litigation filed by Maune, Raichle, Hartley, French & Mudd LLC v. 3M Co., No. 5-15-0235, Ill. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
The potential for such an outcome as well as an example of such assertion was referenced in the briefs relating to the Apple v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
April 24, 2009).Mississippi:  Dalton v. 3M Co., 2013 WL 4886658, at *10 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v 3M Co, the 11th Circuit found that the defendant had no “intention to profit” where the defendant indicated no intention to sell or utilize the domain to divert plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v 3M Co, the 11th Circuit found that the defendant had no “intention to profit” where the defendant indicated no intention to sell or utilize the domain to divert plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:58 pm by Steven Buchwald
Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v 3M Co, the 11th Circuit found that the defendant had no “intention to profit” where the defendant indicated no intention to sell or utilize the domain to divert plaintiff’s customers. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
(citations omitted).Third, the economic incentives are all wrong, as non-manufacturer liability rewards questionable practices by generic manufacturers and penalizes more careful competitors:Careful Drug Co. gets word from the field that its drug, “X”, might cure high blood pressure when a doctor comes to it with a case series. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:11 pm
 Instead, Effient and Brilinta, as well as several new generic drugs, will have to concentrate on developing their new patient market. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am by Stephanie Figueroa
" Avery Dennison requested reexamination of two 3M patents for retro-reflective sheeting (see inter partes Request Nos. (8) & (9)). 3M has sued Avery in Minnesota for infringement of those two patents, as well as two other similar patents. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:11 am by Stephanie Figueroa
" Avery Dennison requested reexamination of two 3M patents for retro-reflective sheeting (see inter partes Request Nos. (8) & (9)). 3M has sued Avery in Minnesota for infringement of those two patents, as well as two other similar patents. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:51 am by Don Burton
  The Federal Circuit’s latest case on whether a declaratory judgment was properly filed, 3M Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:47 pm
The court declined to decide whether the Commission’s bundling theory under LePage’s Inc. v. 3M, 324 F.3d 141, ultimately would be successful in the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]