Search for: "Wells v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc."
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 8:16 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch, the Ninth Circuit found that the unauthorized use of several photographs of surf legends in an Abercrombie clothing catalog was commercial, notwithstanding that the images were employed to illustrate the catalogue’s underlying surf theme.[17] The Ninth Circuit stated that the photographs were mere “window dressing” to the catalog’s surf motif and ultimately were exploited to promote Abercrombie’s clothing… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:22 pm
Relying on EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:24 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 135 S. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 11:42 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, 575 U.S. ___ (2015). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Sambo's of Georgia, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc.). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 2028 (2015), supported its argument that an employer’s refusal to accommodate a religious practice is a stand-alone violation of the Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:35 am
Booking.com B.V. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a… [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:51 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., if an applicant can show that the need for a religious accommodation is a “motivating factor” in the employer’s decision not to hire him or her, the employer violates Title VII, regardless of whether the employer had actual knowledge of the applicant’s religious beliefs or whether he or she will actually need an accommodation. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:50 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., if an applicant can show that her need for a religious accommodation is a “motivating factor” in the employer’s decision not to hire her, the employer has violated Title VII, regardless of whether it had actual knowledge of the applicant’s religious beliefs or whether she would actually need an accommodation. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
