Search for: "White v. Cooper et al" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
”  It asserted that unredacted versions would “disclose law enforcement investigation techniques, procedures, and guidelines,” by revealing “interagency cooperation procedures” and guidelines for when spouses and children trigger . . . for further security investigation and [for] how to conduct that process. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note that the petition that the panel just granted was filed by the challengers (Missouri et al.), and argues that the panel erred in finding no First Amendment violation by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the State Department's Global Engagement Center. [* * *] In yesterday's decision in Missouri v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Alabama, Circuit docket 11-14532, and Hispanic Coalition, et al., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Justices Brown and Rowe, dissenting, would dismiss the appeal, substantially for the reasons of Justice White. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:54 am
The theory of civil liability is that Duke is liable for the harm caused by this expression because Brodhead, et al., failed to stop these faculty members and students from engaging in this expression. [read post]