Search for: "AS PTO, LLC"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
” The application, actually filed by Drumpf Industries, LLC, is for use of the mark in the “provision of a website featuring multimedia. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:30 am
But Burton Fishman, an attorney with Fortney & Scott, LLC, in Washington, D.C., said the new requirements are like taking a “look through the other end of the telescope” since most contractors, particularly the larger ones, are likely to already have paid time off (PTO) policies that provide employees with paid sick leave. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:47 am
Ocinomled, Ltd. and Emeril’s Food of Love Productions, LLC, 115 USPQ2d 1007 (TTAB 2015) [precedential] [TTABlogged here]. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 5:38 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:37 am
" Energy Heating, LLC et al v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
Westlake Services, LLC et al, 2-13-cv-01523 (CACD January 5, 2016, Order) (Otero, J.) [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
On the merits, the PTAB found that the submitted prior art did not render the particularly challenged claims obvious. = = = = [1] Redline Detection, LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:23 am
Brand Named Beds, LLC, 500 F.Supp.2d 296, 317 (S.D.N.Y 2007) (just to pick a recent case from my neighborhood). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 7:13 am
" eDekka LLC v. 3balls.com, Inc., 2-15-cv-00541 (TXED December 17, 2015, Order) (Gilstrap, J.) [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:55 am
For some background: Axiom created an LLC and transferred certain assets to the LLC; the LLC ran into financial trouble and its assets were bought by HTRD, which filed paperwork with the PTO to assign Axiom’s trademarks to itself. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:02 am
Puerto Rico Coffee Roasters LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 10:44 am
From the precedential decision:SightSound Technologies, LLC (“SightSound”) is theowner of U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 75 [week ending on Sunday 6 December] – BHG on blocking injunctions | IP in Universities | Sweden on blocking injunctions | Canadian musings on patents | US Senate and trade secret reform | Chinese IP Courts | G1/14 referral and Article 108 EPC | PACE procedure (Procedure for Accelerated Conduct of Examination) ant the EPO | Greekat and trade mark partenalism | EPO Boards of Appeal tell AC: we were… [read post]
