Search for: "B. S. Brown" Results 381 - 400 of 4,118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2022, 7:21 am by Alex Phipps
Brown, 306 N.C. 151 (1982), provides criminal defendants may have a right to inspect a crime scene under limited circumstances, the court distinguished defendant’s situation from Brown. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am by INFORRM
The Guardian’s arguments The appeal was not concerned with the judge’s substantive decision to seal up Prince Philip’s will and various related matters. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court’s recent decision overturning its 1973 decision Roe v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Not long thereafter, the City fired Myers, allegedly for secretly recording a meeting between him, City Manager Wayne Davis, and Police Chief Matt Brown. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Arneson, 766 F.3d 774, 793 (8th Cir. 2014) (applying the Brown v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:27 am by Harbir Deol
Title III § 302(a)(v)(II)(cc) (2018)[xiii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(b)[xiv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1005[xv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(1)(B)(i)[xvi] 31 CFR § 800.901(b)[xvii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1004[xviii] Coalition Letter on the National Critical Capabilities and Defense Act by U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 7:05 am by Troy Rosasco
B is for the border, with the edges of a mole or other spot on the skin being irregular or blurred. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:36 am by Maureen K. Ohlhausen & Ben Rossen
FTC, the Supreme Court struck down the FTC’s use of Section 13(b) to obtain equitable monetary relief, in part, because the FTC Act elsewhere imposes specific limitations on the commission’s authority to obtain monetary relief. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Recent Judgments On 1 July 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Lee v Brown [2022] EWHC 1699 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am by Nedim Malovic
Accordingly, the applicant’s mark was not devoid of any distinctive character, pursuant to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 (EUTMR).BackgroundIn 2019, The Absolut Company Aktiebolag (the applicant), applied to register the following 3D mark as an EUTM:Registration was sought for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages, namely vodka) of the Nice Classification.In 2021, the EUIPO Examiner refused the application on the basis that the relevant consumers would not… [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 3:32 pm
This planning was consistent with Canada Revenue Agency’s own interpretation of the attribution rule, s. 75(2), at the time these transactions were carried out. [read post]