Search for: "Dept of Corrections" Results 381 - 400 of 1,297
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2018, 10:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Dept. of Natural Res., 530 S.E.2d 112 (2000) (rejecting constitutional challenges by three to two vote). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:45 pm by EEM
": The Systematic Violation of Immigrants’ Right to Counsel at the Cibola County Correctional Center (National Immigrant Justice Center, Nov. 2017) [text]Young Arrivers in Immigration Detention (Border Criminologies Blog, Jan. 2018) [access]- This blog series includes three posts; follow the link for the first and access the other two via the "See also" menu on the right.Related post:- Thematic Focus: Detention (5 Dec. 2017)Tagged Publications and Events… [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Rondeau’s causes of action based on violation of Judiciary Law § 487 fare no better as Rondeau has not sufficiently alleged facts demonstrating “either a deceit that reaches the level of egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior” on the part of defendant (see Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2015); Seldon v Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, 116 AD3d 490, 491 [1st Dept 2014), lv dismissed… [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Here is a pleading template for a post-judgment motion to challenge a default judgment entered in favor of any one of the multiple National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 5:59 pm by Jeralyn
Update: He'll live in Las Vegas for the "forseeable future," says the Nevada Dept. of Corrections. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 2:32 pm by Benjamin Wittes
The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 6:58 am by Jason Shinn
But the Supreme Court later in Sutton v United Air Lines, Inc, decided that with corrective measures (in Sutton the issue were corrective lenses) to mitigate the plaintiff’s impairment did not substantially limit a major life activity and therefore they were not disabled. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:57 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I am happy to report the posting of a new paper, currently titled "From a “Two Thrust Approach” to a “Two Sword One Thrust Strategy” to Combat Criminal Corruption: Corporate Compliance, Prosecutorial Discretion, and Sovereign Investor Oversight. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 3:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is within courts’ “sound judicial discretion to identify cases that justify relaxation of limitations strictures . . . to facilitate decisions on the merits if the correction will not cause undue prejudice to the plaintiff’s adversary” (id. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, President Trump tweeted, “The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
There was no question that the hearing officers findings were correct; Petitioner was guilty of all charges and specifications. [read post]