Search for: "Does 1 - 35"
Results 381 - 400
of 9,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 7:13 am
Praxair Distribution, Inc. et al, 1-15-cv-00170 (DED September 5, 2017, Order) (Sleet, USDJ) [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:12 am
Louis traffic ticket case start at $35. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:05 am
The issues in Ex parte MAIERAppealed claims 1-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:06 am
The examiner rejected claims 1, 3– 6, 9–11, 13–16, 19, and 20 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
As a consequence, it was argued, the colour-inverted use altered the distinctive character (Art. 18(1)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:50 am
Night 1 of the RNC was about 50/50. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 6:53 am
Webvention Holdings LLC et al, 1-11-cv-03620 (MDD June 7, 2016, Order) (Blake, J.) [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 3:54 pm
This it does not do (see ibid.). [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
AIA §§18(a)(1), (d)(1), 125 Stat.329, note following 35 U. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 10:56 am
Affirmed.NFP civil opinions today (1): In Julie Ratliff v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:11 am
— (1) In general. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
This precedential holding makes clear that a transaction lacking transfer of title, authorization to re-sell, and involving stockpiling does not constitute a commercial sale for purposes of §102(b)/ §102(a)(1). [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:18 am
(The relevant inquiry here is whether the additional instructional limitation has a “new and unobvious functional relationship” with the method, that is, whether the limitation in no way depends on the method,and the method does not depend on the limitation).OutcomeThe rejection of claims 1-4 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 10:08 am
On October 1, 2018, Trustee filed a letter saying Attorney still hadn’t complied. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:26 pm
§ 1.175(a)(1). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:12 pm
In one scenario, the client does too much on their own and ends up putting themselves in legal peril because of their lack of legal knowledge and support. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:57 pm
This may be different depending upon whether focusing on 102(b)(1)(a); 102(b)(1)(b); 102(b)(1)(c); or 102(b)(1)(d). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 10:59 am
(via Fish & Richardson) Related posts:How Long Does it Take for the Patent Office to Look at National Entry Papers? [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:49 am
” KSR, 550 U.S. at 417.The result is a mixed bag:In summary, we reverse the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-7, and 22-28under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:13 am
This refusal was confirmed by the BoA in case R0153/2021-1. [read post]
