Search for: "Does 1-194"
Results 381 - 400
of 683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 9:59 am
Feb. 1, 2013). [read post]
Court of Appeal delivers stunnig rebuke of misclassification certification opinions based on Brinker
27 Jan 2014, 10:37 am
Big Lots Stores, Inc., supra, 194 Cal.App.4th 496, 124 Cal.Rptr.3d 535; Arenas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
Superior Court (2004) 34 Cal.4th 319, 326, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 906, 96 P.3d 194; Ghazaryan v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
As the Supreme Court observed, albeit not in the product liability context, “[m]eaningful disclosure does not mean more disclosure. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
Supp. 2d 188, 194, fn. 5 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:34 am
It wasn’t the right time to "cut plaintiffs off at the knees":[T]his order does not settle any law that will be applied at trial. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 4:12 pm
Super. 194 (Ch. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:45 am
After a jury convicted Jeffrey Lynn Nielsen of disorderly conduct in violation of Minnesota Statutes § 609.72(1)(3) and he “was sentenced to a $1,000 fine and 90 days in jail, with $700 and 89 days suspended for one year. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
” Id. at 8[1]. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 3:56 am
[Doc. 194 at 3, n.1] It appears that this prerequisite to a valid guilty plea was entirely overlooked in Defendant’s case. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 11:26 am
Grabowski, 781 P.2d 192, 194 (Colo. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 which upheld the practice of negotiating a term sheet at the outset of project processing. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
Rep. 194 (K.B [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm
Further, that the law of passing off does not confer monopolies to successful get-ups. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
(2) In particular, is it sufficient that, under national law and/or practice and/or under the collective agreements and/or contractual arrangements negotiated between employers and workers, the payment made enables and encourages the worker to take and to enjoy, in the fullest sense of these words, his or her annual leave; and does not involve any sensible risk that the worker will not do so? [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
(2) In particular, is it sufficient that, under national law and/or practice and/or under the collective agreements and/or contractual arrangements negotiated between employers and workers, the payment made enables and encourages the worker to take and to enjoy, in the fullest sense of these words, his or her annual leave; and does not involve any sensible risk that the worker will not do so? [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
(2) In particular, is it sufficient that, under national law and/or practice and/or under the collective agreements and/or contractual arrangements negotiated between employers and workers, the payment made enables and encourages the worker to take and to enjoy, in the fullest sense of these words, his or her annual leave; and does not involve any sensible risk that the worker will not do so? [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Salla, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2013 WL 1681220 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) [read post]
