Search for: "Does 1-88" Results 381 - 400 of 2,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
One of the more delicate situations a professional representative can encounter is when his/her client does not settle the bills. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As pointed out in T 472/88 [2], in the statement contained in decisions T 227/88 and T 301/87: “fresh objections based on A 84 are not allowed if such objections did not arise out of the amendments so made”, the word “arise” should be broadly construed. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board went on: “However, this does not mean that i f R 64 (a) is not or not correctly met then A 107 first sentence will necessarily not be complied with” (idem). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The right to be heard in OPs subsists so long as proceedings are pending before the EPO (T 556/95 [4.4], T 598/88 [3]). [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm by Armand Grinstajn
Moreover, the board does not consider this undisclosed negative feature as being an allowable disclaimer in the meaning of decision G 1/03, because the anticipation necessitating the amendment (D4) cannot be considered as accidental. [2.3] Therefore, the main request has to be rejected because [it] contravenes the requirements of A 123(2). [2.4] To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm by Todd Presnell
  Lund filed an Internal Discipline Complaint over the incident, and the RPD investigated the arrest and prepared an 88-page report. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm by Todd Presnell
  Lund filed an Internal Discipline Complaint over the incident, and the RPD investigated the arrest and prepared an 88-page report. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:28 am by Alex Gasser
  With respect to the functionality discussed on page 124, n. 19 of the ID, please cite to all evidence of record indicating how this feature operates and how this feature does or does not meet the “a calculating device” limitation of claim 1. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
Only by pondering a bit does Harris-Perry’s insidious (to borrow a word) false equivalence emerge. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:27 pm by David Jensen
The agency does not identify applicants by name until after the board acts and then only the winners. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Treasury and IRS propose regulations on the methodology for constructing the yield curve underlying present value calculations for defined benefit plans. 88 Fed. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:09 pm
  Id. at *4 (text added, citation removed).Mechanical Linear Actuators are not Distinct "[The specification describes] a preferred embodiment in which 'each actuator 88 is a mechanical linear actuator.' [read post]
15 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Co., 88 NY2d 869, and [2] that the violation must be of the kind that "creates a substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety," citing Remba v Federation Empl. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:04 am by David DePaolo
BPS.To help speed the process, the requests specified exact contract numbers and requested a prompt electronic response.The Comptroller had not produced the copies of the contract in any form as of July 1. [read post]