Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge" Results 381 - 400 of 1,611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign finance experts say they are especially concerned about video-streaming services at a moment when more Americans are shifting their viewing habits from cable to the Web. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION In Re SAVAN THACH Debtor : : : : : : Case No. 19-10514 Chapter 13 Judge Hopkins ORDER DIRECTING ATTORNEYS H. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The confidentiality of a police investigation might well mean that as a matter of fact the information was inaccessible to those outside the inquiry. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The presiding judges said they were not convinced by Democracy Watch’s arguments that the actions of the governor-in-council in making the appointments were “unreasonable. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
Trump additionally cites two OLC opinions from 1985 and 1986 to argue that the executive branch can judge the “legitimacy” of a congressional investigation. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Senate acquitted President Trump of charges he abused his power and obstructed Congress to aid his own re-election, bringing an acrimonious impeachment trial to its expected end. [read post]
Finally, the Supreme Court’s refusal to re-engage will likely increase the pressure on Congress to enact a legislative “fix” to § 101. 3. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Tuesday, February 4, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.: Governance Studies at The Brookings Institution will convene a panel of policy experts to discuss President Trump’s 2020 State of the Union address to Congress and the nation. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
They were re-arguing the issues already addressed in the original decision, and did not address the threshold question in any substantive way. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
Second, the judge framed the Rule 702 issue, in line with the statute, and Ninth Circuit precedent, as an inquiry whether expert witnesses deviated from the standard of care of how scientists “conduct their research and reach their conclusions. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 9:41 am by Phil Dixon
Rejecting the claim, the court noted: “The judge took a measured, thoughtful approach to the jurors’ concerns. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
  It contains an important proviso that such reports notify the recipients that the information shall be kept confidential, shall be used only in connection with the child protective, foster care or related proceedings under the Family Court Act and may not be re-disclosed except as necessary for such proceeding or proceedings and as authorized by law. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The judges appeared to express some skepticism about the doctrine. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” The inquiry marks the latest effort by House lawmakers to probe Facebook’s digital defenses after Russian agents weaponized the site to stoke social unrest during the 2016 race. [read post]
Reinforcing the theoretical nature of the inquiry, the court added “the likely actual impact of an activity is not at issue in determining its status as a project. [read post]
Reinforcing the theoretical nature of the inquiry, the court added “the likely actual impact of an activity is not at issue in determining its status as a project. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
   “We have students so concerned about their privacy that they’re resorting to covering their [laptop] cameras and microphones with tape,” a junior said at the October 18, 2018 meeting. [read post]