Search for: "In re Dominic F."
Results 381 - 400
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2015, 11:44 am
NFL, 790 F. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:18 pm
We know that domination is exerted upon our bodies and upon our minds. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Blake Reid, Samuelson-Glushko Technology Law & Policy Clinic at Colorado Law: Existing exemptions for (j), (g), and (f) for research/reverse engineering, but as we detailed in comments, there are shortcomings in each. [read post]
6 May 2015, 4:27 am
"They're prepared to run that gauntlet? [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
The validity of the patent was sustained in a director-ordered re-exam. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Le gouvernement du Québec peut légitimement promulguer des lois qui englobent certains moyens de télécommunication (comme Internet) associés à la sphère fédérale de compétence. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Davis Benngriffdavis Toledo Fergal Davis Fergal_Davis Univ New South Wales Jeremy de Beer jdebeer Ottawa Dominic de Cogan domcogan Cambridge Fiona De Londras fdelond Durham (UK) Sarah Deer sarahdeer William Mitchell Marc DeGirolami MarcODeGirolami St. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
It is the dominant portion of the mark. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:08 am
” See In re Thomas Barton, Serial No. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:28 pm
NFL Films, Inc., 542 F.3d 1007, 1014–15 (3d Cir. 2008). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 3:49 am
In re Michael D. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
Westport Insurance Corporation, 751 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 11:01 am
Commentary on the report continues to dominate editorial pages. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Westport Insurance Corporation, 751 F.3d 129 (3d Cir. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
D.C. 179, 185 n.6, 348 F.2d 791, 797 n.6 (1965). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 10:27 am
I put both these items in the “meaningful but minor” category because I don’t want to say they’re meaningless, but at the same time we have heard this before and problems persist. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
I'm going to f...ing kill Google. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
See In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1204, 1209, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1691 (Fed. [read post]
