Search for: "In re R. S." Results 381 - 400 of 111,648
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2020, 12:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property Chair, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), who was re-elected to a second term this November with about 49% of the vote, last week released the Subcommittee’s 116th Congressional Report. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
October 10, 2008 Re: Creating And Sustaining The Unsustainable. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 9:29 am
La présente étude est la première qui examine de manière synthétique toutes les procédures de communications individuelles établies en vertu de traités onusiens relatifs aux droits de l’homme. [read post]
13 May 2020, 7:29 am by Pierre T. Nguyen
En 2019, l’IPIC l’a honorée comme première récipiendaire du prix Traiblazer. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:32 am by admin
On the other hand, the journalist hears from tax authorities of Shanghai, Jiangsu that re-examination work will mainly focus on R&D activity and review of finance data. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
In re Jung is different: it's about the Examiner's requirement to make a prima facie case. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:04 pm by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen In re Verizon Business Network Services Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 5:52 pm by FHH Law
But you don’t need his imprimatur to know that you’re dealing with the broadcast industry’s next generation of up-and-comers. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:43 pm by Patent Docs
All these features of patent law are present in one form or another in the Federal Circuit's decision handed down today in In re Qapsule Technologies, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:18 am
Fitzgerald (Centre for International Governance Innovation), Valerie Hughes (Queen's Univ. - Law), & Mark Jewett (Centre for International Governance Innovation) have published Reflections on Canada’s Past, Present and Future in International Law / Réflexions sur le passé, le présent et l’avenir du Canada en matière de droit international (CIGI Press 2018). [read post]
30 May 2008, 7:53 pm
Comme c'est souvent le cas, posez la question, c'est y répondre. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Jack D
Comme je l’écrivais récemment, le « projet de spécifications fonctionnelles des moyens de sécurisation » rédigé par Michel Riguidel a fuité et tout un chacun, qui porte un intérêt à la Haute Autorité pour la diffusion des œuvres et la protection des droits sur Internet et à ses travaux, peut se le procurer et en prendre connaissance. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 11:14 am
It's not the broken promises and the outright lying, although we're getting close. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
La R.56(3) CBE se réfère toujours aux parties manquantes (si les parties manquantes...), donc les mêmes que celles des R.56(1) et (2). [read post]