Search for: "MR. DOE" Results 381 - 400 of 35,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 6:47 pm
  Does the administration expect ObamaCare to live? [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am by SW
The much-anticipated decision in R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin) has arrived, confirming that in an emergency, “Everyone In” really does mean everyone. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:27 am
Libby does seem such a jolly good fellow. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Mr. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 1:51 pm
Ah, yes, it was in the text of the Mueller report: "While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:03 am
I think back to what Michael Haz wrote in the comments to yesterday's Edward Snowden post: Mr. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The label assigned by the parties to the relationship between them does not determine if it is that of an employer-employee or as an independent contractorMowry v DiNapoli, 2013 NY Slip Op 07794, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentJohn M. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:12 pm by Paul Caron
Gingrich has a significantly better [tax] plan than does Mr. [read post]