Search for: "SCOTT L. v. State" Results 381 - 400 of 1,006
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2016, 11:41 am
Carl Schmitt Scott Sheeran, Human rights and derogation in peacekeeping: addressing a legal vacuum within the state of exception Diane A. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
  If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees,  you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 3:30 am by Bethany Berger
” The case was immediately decried as the Dred Scott for Indians, but unlike Dred Scott, much of Lone Wolf remains good law. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Felony cases are randomly assigned to the circuit Judges.The Drug Crimes rule also states, "When a  [Misdemeanor Drug Crimes] notice to appear, criminal report affidavit, or information is filed, the clerk will assign the case according to the following alphabetical distribution. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Scott Valente and The Eliv Group, LLCCase number: 14-cv-03974 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: June 3, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: February 17, 2016 3/31/2016 6/29/2016 2016-47 SEC v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Taylor v City of New York 2016 NY Slip Op 03454 Decided on May 3, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
 Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]