Search for: "State v. Harm" Results 381 - 400 of 25,805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2015, 12:45 pm by Amanda Traphagan
Justice Kennedy wrote that this change in the nature of commerce in the United States makes these decisions out of date and that this physical presence standard has cost states a great deal of harm through lost revenue. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:24 am
Google, Inc., citing the United States Supreme Court decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The injunction impermissibly im- poses the UCL on entirely extraterritorial conduct regard- less of whether the conduct in other states causes harm to California. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:40 am
   The level of popular and official venom is so high on this matter that it dwarfs the evidence of "a bare desire to harm" that animated the Court's conclusions in Moreno or Romer v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:09 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [France][Petition granted][ Consent and Grave risk of harm not established] Peyre v McGary, 2023 WL 3726728. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:19 am by Viking
WHETHER AN ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATION THAT FAILS TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE EITHER POTENTIAL TERMINAL ELEMENT STATES AN OFFENSE UNDER THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDINGS IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:16 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: In 1874, the Supreme Court held in Murdock v City of Memphis that it lacked “jurisdiction” to review a state supreme court’s interpretation of state law, even in cases that present federal-law claims. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
After all, it seems to involve a non-tariff trade barrier, harming other states. [read post]