Search for: "State v. Holland" Results 381 - 400 of 1,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
There is still a tension between the ruling of the House of Lords (as it then was) in Campbell v MGN and the subsequent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in Von Hannover v Germany. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions France Actress Julie Gayet has won privacy damages after two french magazines published photos taken with a long-lens of her and partner Francois Hollande. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
At an international meeting, Holland had signed a communiqué stating that cuts of at least 25% to 40% by 2020 were necessary. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:48 am by Lyle Denniston
**  A request for the Court to clarify the doctrine that a suing party generally can be excused for having missed a filing deadline if it would be unfair to enforce the deadline — a concept that the Court laid down in the 2010 decision in Holland v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:18 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Circuit misapplied this Court’s Holland decision when it ruled that the Tribe was not entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations for filing of Indian Self-Determination Act claims under the Contract Disputes Act? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Circuit misapplied this Court's decision in Holland v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In delivering the judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal authority Borneman v Wilson (1884) 28 Ch D 53 suggests that a trustee in bankruptcy must either adopt proceedings in their entirety or not at all, even where there are discrete prior proceedings conducted by the bankrupt before his appointment. [read post]