Search for: "State v. McDonnell " Results 381 - 400 of 634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Daniel Schwartz
(It’s called the McDonnell-Douglas test and I’ve talked about it on the blog before.) [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm by Theodore T. Eidukas
The court, therefore, rejected a per se argument and concluded that a pregnant worker seeking to show disparate treatment must satisfy the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am by Leiza Dolghih
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:28 pm by Joy Waltemath
Significantly, the employer took no adverse action until it received clear evidence of her improper disclosure and of her falsification of an employment application (Johnson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, applying a modified McDonnell Douglas analysis, the state high court revived a 59-year-old job applicant’s age bias claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:33 pm by Joy Waltemath
Because there was direct evidence of discrimination, the McDonnell Douglas burden shifting framework was unnecessary. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part (Smith-Schrenk v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:42 pm by Joy Waltemath
The employee’s negligent hiring, retention, and supervision claims failed (Shackelford v Publix Super Markets, Inc, October 14, 2014, Haikala, M). [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Maureen McDonnell was acquitted of lying on a loan document. [read post]