Search for: "Time Warner Inc."
Results 381 - 400
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
On Tuesday 29 July 2014, there will be an application in the case of Hegglin v Google Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that employees qualify for the California “commissioned employee” exemption in a pay period only if they receive “earnings [that] exceed one and one-half (1-1/2) times the minimum wage” in that two-week pay period. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:23 pm
Time Warner Cable Inc., issued a decision interpreting the first prong of the test: the compensation requirement. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:04 am
Fairfax attorney Andaleeb Geloo filed a defamation action against various anonymous posters to the Fairfax Underground site and sought to uncover their identities by issuing subpoenas to Time Warner Cable, Verizon, and Cox Communications. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
If we expand the disjunctive premise to more than one disjunction, we can repeat the inference (iteratively), eliminating one disjunct at a time, until we arrive at a conclusion that is a simple, affirmative proposition, without any disjunctions in it. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 6:50 am
Warner Music Group Corp., Case No. 1:13-cv-4449 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
A Time Warner ...That ought to work, right? [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
But unlike Levine, where the government at least tried to justify its changed views, this time around the government hides its head in the sand, ostrich style, and fails to acknowledge that it was for preemption before it was against it. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm
Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:55 am
The New York Times' David Carr and Ravi Somaiya report on the solitary, and financially dangerous, way ahead for Time, Inc., after it parts ways with Time Warner. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Critikon, Inc., 781 F. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:02 am
See, e.g., In re Time Warner, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm
”(emphasis added) (citing Warner-Lambert, 316 F.3d at1354–55). [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:12 am
In the mergers & acquisitions category, antitrust’s most recent obsession is the deal between Comcast Corp. and Time Warner Cable., Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
If a domain does not act in time, it seems PIPCU will contact advertisers and demand that all revenue to the infringing site be shut down.A group of film studios including Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., Disney Enterprises Inc., Paramount Pictures Corp., Universal City Studios Productions, Columbia Pictures Industries Inc. and Warner Bros. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
” This did not convince the court, which focused on the differences in time, quality, and cost of reproducing entire works on a photocopier compared to the Make-A-Tape machine. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Sodrac 2003 Inc., 2014 FCA 84 -> How to return computers after Anton Pillar seizure 9219-1568 Quebec Inc. v. [read post]
