Search for: "US v. Peter Paul"
Results 381 - 400
of 780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
This brings us to the second enquiry; which is, 2dly. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:55 am
Jane noted that the appellees in Klayman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
[cross-posted and expanded with a P.S. from Cato at Liberty] Even by his standards, Paul Krugman uses remarkably ugly and truculent language in challenging the good faith of those who take a view opposed to his on the case of King v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
X: A Tribute to Peter N. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 10:00 am
ABKCO v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
The dispute substantially concerns the question of whether the use of a pair of coloured overlapping ovals with a distinctive word element can save a sign constituted of two black overlapping ovals without any word sign from non-use revocation. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 8:57 pm
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Adam Conrad of King & Spalding, and Peter Menell of the University of California at Berkeley School of Law will review and analyze the oral argument in Teva v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Peter W.J. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Lawfare was the scene of lively debate this week between Steve Vladeck and Peter Margulies over al Bahlul v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
This is a book review of Patent Law In Greater China, edited by Stefan Luginbuehl and Peter Ganea. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am
Separately, note the issues with the Ponikau/Mayo patents such as US 6,207,703 as discussed in Peter Landau, Critics Turn Up Noses at Mayo's patent for inflamed sinus cure, Wall St. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
The constitutionality of having scientists, or specially qualified judges, serve as fact finders has never been clearly addressed.[6] Other commentators have argued in favor of the existing set of judicial tools, such as appointment of testifying “neutral” expert witnesses and scientific advisors for trial judges.[7] These approaches have been generally available in federal and some state trial courts, but they have rarely been used. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Paul Bernal’s blog had a number of posts on the subject, including “Surveillance and Austerity” and “DRIP: normalising the surveillance state”. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 6:55 am
Wells brought us the ruling. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am
They are instead of the “take from A to give to B,” robbing Peter to pay Paul variety. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
” In Bits and Bytes this week, Paul brought us a wealth of cyber news. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
The Polis blog has a piece by Charlie Beckett “What does the Brooks Coulson phone-hacking verdict tell us about editors’ responsibility for their newsrooms? [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:49 am
Mark Martins’ statements before a pre-trial motions hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
