Search for: "Weaver v. Weaver" Results 381 - 400 of 764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
As held in People v Lewis, People v Ventimiglia, People v Santarelli and People v Allweiss, it is elementary that evidence of a defendant's prior criminal or immoral conduct is inadmissible if it cannot logically be linked to some specific material issue in the case. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
The defendant was a remedial math teacher at Glenwood Elementary School in Vestal, New York at the time of the alleged criminal incidents. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Brandeis School of Law, [and 5 others].Weaver, Russell L., 1952-St. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 136713, Aug. 21, 2013) and refused to grant summary judgment to defendants in a Buddhist prisoner's complaint that he was wrongly taken off a strict vegan diet after a correctional officer inaccurately reported he had been seen eating eggs.In Weaver v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am by Shamnad Basheer
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions but that under the relevant facts in this case “did not require a warrant. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am by S
Which is all very well if they are a local authority or housing association that meets the criteria in Weaver but what if they are a private landlord or housing association that does not meet the criteria in Weaver? [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:37 am by S
Which is all very well if they are a local authority or housing association that meets the criteria in Weaver but what if they are a private landlord or housing association that does not meet the criteria in Weaver? [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 6:46 am by Giles Peaker
Yarlington’s policy and management of the project may well be open to challenge, potentially under public law (if Weaver v L&Q applies) or possibly via Article 8. [read post]