Search for: "I v. B"
Results 3981 - 4000
of 24,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
I am about to file one in a case (citing United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 5:29 am
Jean-Paul and another v LB Southwark [2011] UKUT 178 (LC) is, I suspect, going to cause some difficulties for LVTs (and lawyers) up and down the country. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:22 am
Cutter & Buck, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:25 am
Session 2: Institutions I Moderator: Patrick R. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
I, §8, cl. 1. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am
First, a big thank you to Jack for inviting me to contribute to the blog.The fulcrum of the 5-4 divide in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Turning to consider the UTCCR, the court reviewed whether or not (i) ParkingEye had breached the requirement of good faith; and (ii) if so, whether it had caused a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract to the detriment of the consumers. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:13 pm
., v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
Bouchat v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
Jordan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm
In Phase I of this model, CMS would have tested a change from the average sales price (ASP) plus 6% Part B payment methodology to ASP plus 2.5%, plus a flat fee of $16.80. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 6:29 pm
[SEC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day, XCentric Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
"Civil Rights Law §50-b(1) provides a statutory exemption from disclosure for documents that tend to identify the victim of a sex offense", noting Matter of Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d at 843.The Appellate Division further observed that ODA "also satisfied its burden of establishing that all of the requested records were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
"Civil Rights Law §50-b(1) provides a statutory exemption from disclosure for documents that tend to identify the victim of a sex offense", noting Matter of Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d at 843.The Appellate Division further observed that ODA "also satisfied its burden of establishing that all of the requested records were exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(e)(i). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
Case citation: Congoo, LLC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Patrick notes: In Hogan-Cross v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
I have it as text for you. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 7:56 am
This is the question the Supreme Court will answer in Jones v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:39 am
State v. [read post]
