Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 3981 - 4000 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 3:30 am by Mark Engstrom
Global Tel*Link Corp, United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2016-1992, 25 April 2017 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
1 May 2017, 9:15 am by rebecca
Levin WHEN: Wednesday, May 3 9:30 am WHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit John Joseph Moakley U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am by Eliot Kim
United States During a teleconference briefing last week, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Southeast Asia Patrick Murphy announced that U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
United States, an immigration case, Chief Justice John Roberts “took issue … with the Trump administration’s stance,” “saying it could make it too easy for the government to strip people of citizenship for lying about minor infractions. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 3:06 am
Opposer provided no evidence that applicant's mark closely approximates its name or identity (for example, United States Marine Corps, U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am by Rachel Bercovitz
The United States previously deployed the so-called “mother of all bombs” against the Islamic State in the province two weeks ago. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 9:21 am by Ashley Deeks
 For a useful 2012 analysis of Swedish extradition law and process, see Stockholm University’s Mark Klamberg here.) [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:46 am
Applicant argued that Opposer’s use of the HAWKWIND mark in the United States for musical recordings (1,000 albums sold per year) was de minimis and that Opposer had abandoned the mark for live musical performances, not having performed in the US for over 10 years. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a naturalized U.S. citizen can be stripped of her citizenship in a criminal proceeding based on an immaterial false statement. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Brian Cordery
She addressed the state of implementation of the Agreement. 12 have ratified so far but not Germany and the UK. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Aren Sharifi
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third party derivative suit pursuant to Fed. [read post]