Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 4041 - 4060
of 8,371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2015, 10:32 am
The Oregon Supreme Court unanimously held this in yesterday’s State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:53 am
Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
" The court explained that these procedures are necessary "to afford tenured civil servant employees... procedural protections prior to involuntary separation from service," citing Sheeran v NYS Department of Transportation, 18 NY3d 61. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 10:03 am
Harjo v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Section 380(1) of the Code reads: Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service, (a) is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offense is a testamentary instrument or the value of the… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:44 pm
One of the more famous cases on the matter, Konchar v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court decided Ohio v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
The Appellate Court of Illinois chimed in a few weeks ago, in Szafranski v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 2:57 am
Bryant, Jr. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:07 am
In the matter of AR (Children) (Scotland), heard 13 May 2015. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
[W]hat WPMC are presenting amounts to a package of the [c]oncert [v]ideo with additional material. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
Race mattered. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 11:18 am
W. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am
In fact, Rule 26(b)(1) describes the scope of allowable discovery as follows: ‛Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action… . [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Specifically, he argues that, as a matter of law, the Commonwealth failed to prove that the value of the item stolen was $200 or more, and therefore, his conviction of grand larceny should be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. . . .Williams v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:01 pm
ALBANY, GA—United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
” Since 1940 and last updated by the WHD while President George W. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
