Search for: "State v. White" Results 4041 - 4060 of 11,802
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2009, 5:12 am
As the Court stated in Garfinkel v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Washingtonian magazine, Amanda Whiting reports that “the battle over Maryland’s 6th [in Benisek v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:22 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In situations where the supervisor decided in favor of the examiner who thought a match was found, the disagreement was not being reported even to prosecutors, much less to the defense, in the crime labs' final reports.I'd noted before that the failure to be forthcoming about in-lab disagreements among examiners violates the state's obligation under Brady v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:23 am by Florian Mueller
The fifth one of seven legislative recommendations made by the White House Task Force on High-Tech Patent Issues in June was to "[c]hange the ITC standard for obtaining an injunction to better align it with the traditional four-factor test in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
” By contrast, the Caucasian panelist stated that his son had been arrested several times because his son had a drug problem that had been going on for years. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm by Howard Knopf
  It’s interesting to contrast the UK Red Bus decision with the recent  controversial US 2nd Circuit decision in Cariou v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 7:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
He is in a black silk robe with the crimson sash and the white tie. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In allowing abortion providers to sue only a narrow set of state officials, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
Alabama where the Court held that state universities could have a quota of fifty percent white men given that white males had been allegedly discriminated against from the mid-1970's to 2025. [read post]