Search for: "State v. Field"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 11,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2012, 4:57 pm
The state relies primarily on a 1976 case, De Canas v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
(Mass.) 1999); Kim v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
In 1993, this practice led to the Utah Supreme Court ruling in East Jordan Irrigation Company v Morgan, commonly known as "the East Jordan Case." [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:00 am
Ward v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), and "levels the playing field" between local and out-of-state retailers. [read post]
18 May 2009, 6:54 pm
Heartwood, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 12:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:05 pm
In a 2001 Appellate Division case, State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 5:05 pm
In a 2001 Appellate Division case, State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 2:28 pm
In the recent case of State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
Ctr. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:57 am
In State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Judge Sarah Vance’s opinion in Burst v. [read post]
