Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 4121 - 4140 of 21,337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:49 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
Late last month, Justice Burley handed down his decision in Doric Products Pty Ltd v Asia Pacific Trading (Aust) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 849. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:49 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
Late last month, Justice Burley handed down his decision in Doric Products Pty Ltd v Asia Pacific Trading (Aust) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 849. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:49 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
Late last month, Justice Burley handed down his decision in Doric Products Pty Ltd v Asia Pacific Trading (Aust) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 849. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:49 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
Late last month, Justice Burley handed down his decision in Doric Products Pty Ltd v Asia Pacific Trading (Aust) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 849. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The scheme provided that victims could claim compensation directly from the designated compensation body in their own member state, in certain circumstances. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 The Supreme Court has finally decided on the issue that has been hanging over private sector possession claims since Pinnock and Powell – whether article 8 proportionality of eviction defence might also apply to the private sector as well as to public body landlords. [read post]