Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 4121 - 4140 of 8,925
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
The returning cases include, a bit surprisingly, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:39 am by Bill Raftery
However, that effort was struck down by Federal courts only a day or two after the election (Awad v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rick Pildes
Tipaldo, minimum-wage laws on the books in a third of the states, in some cases, for decades. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:28 am by Anna Christensen
United States (Granted )Docket: 09-11311Issue(s): Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (7th Circuit) Title: Goodyear v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
They had lived and worked in New York State for most of their adult lives, but planned to return to Canada if they could find suitable work. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally have upheld them in… [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:01 am
Board of Education (1954); service as a federal appellate judge; service as Solicitor General of the United States; and service as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 10:10 pm
The name of the lawsuit is Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:21 am by NCC Staff
Becerra, a case currently in front of a United States District Court that centers on whether a provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires insurance providers to cover certain services and medicines without cost-sharing is unconstitutional, and contends that there is a good chance that part of the law will be struck down. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:58 am
  The decision does not spell out what was ambiguous about the retainer agreement, but both the bench and the appeal court determined that this "engagement" letter was insufficient to spell out an attorney-client relationship.LATIN AMERICA FINANCE GROUP, INC. and WILLIAM VAN DIEPEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, -v.- CARLOS PAREJA and PAREJA Y ASOCIADOS, Defendants-Appellees. 06-3888-cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT … [read post]