Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 5,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2014, 8:46 am
These two concepts collided in the case of Krenicki v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 11:30 am
In Department of Fish and Game v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:21 am
Because of the decision in Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Back when we were in law school, we felt the same angst when Professors Sum and Substance couldn't agree on a legal point.)In the last 20 years, courts have come full circle.The Wright & Miller view (which is the one that we prefer) now seems to be carrying the day.In Bailey v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
According to the EEOC’s prior holding in Macy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:21 am
The court in Greathouse v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:21 pm
However, that is exactly what the trial judge did in the case of C.R. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The Court felt it had no ability to respond to the policy argument that RICO should be interpreted to require first-party reliance for fraud-based claims in order to avoid the “overfederalization” of traditional state law claims. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 3:59 pm
The story began with Bush v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm
I think that judicial review is implicit in the Constitution, for the reasons stated by Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:54 am
At first I felt anxious about piping up with my own opinions to a justice of the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
Such a holding would be consistent with Food Lion v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 4:32 am
According to the seminal case of Silver v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Background: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (whatever one may think of the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 11:44 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
" Such a holding would be consistent with Food Lion v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 11:43 am
In Brucia v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:00 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 9:18 am
[emphasis added] Saadati v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
According to the EEOC’s prior holding in Macy v. [read post]
