Search for: "John Does, 1-2"
Results 4141 - 4160
of 10,070
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
1. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
The legal questions in the case were: “(1) Whether Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy, which does not count provisional ballots cast in person on Election Day outside of the voter’s designated precinct, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; and (2) whether Arizona’s ballot-collection law, which permits only certain persons to handle another person’s completed early ballot, violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act or… [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
Stein, holding, by a 2-1 vote, that North Carolina's Property Protection Act is largely unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:14 pm
The authors are grateful to Sadie Creese, Steve Lipner, John Manferdelli and Bart Preneel for comments on earlier drafts. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:46 am
Liu and John Wiley & Sons v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
County of San Bernardino (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 677, 684-685.) [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
” The answer to the above question depended on: 1. the interpretation and application of the FA 1989, s 83(2) (read with sub-s (1) of the same section) (the “First Issue“); and 2. the interpretation and application of the FA 1989, s 83(3) (read with sub-s (4) of the same section) (the “Second Issue“). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
The answer to the above question depended on: 1. the interpretation and application of the FA 1989, s 83(2) (read with sub-s (1) of the same section) (the “First Issue“); and 2. the interpretation and application of the FA 1989, s 83(3) (read with sub-s (4) of the same section) (the “Second Issue“). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 1:46 pm
The data does not include accidents that took place between midnight and 6 a.m. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[End Notes 1 - 28 are provided following the text below with permission.]Modern disciplinary procedures seek to correct undesirable employee behavior and to rehabilitate the worker. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 2:20 am
The company has achieved ISO 27001 compliance and completed a SOC 2 Type 2 audit for all five trust principles for the second year in a row. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 3:49 am
It says Congress by a 2/3 vote can repeal a disqualification but there's not a syllable about who is supposed to enforce it. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
Today in 2-1 decision the 2d Circuit (2-1) affirmed the result below. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Yet nowhere does Justice Alito even discuss what the liberal scholars say in favor of retaining Roe.Dismissing Equal ProtectionTo be sure, Justice Alito does address some of the arguments that the liberals he invokes made for retaining Roe, but his analysis of those points is badly incomplete.In her March 1993 Madison Lecture, Justice Ginsburg made essentially three points about Roe: (1) the outcome was correct; (2) the Court and country might have been better… [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
I emerged from those forty years of spectacularly rich and high-level discussions knowing nothing at all about Leo Strauss, Harry Jaffa, Francis Schaeffer, John Courtney Murray, Bishop Sheen, Richard Weaver, Russell Kirk, Eric Voegelin, or just about any of the other luminaries who fill up Ken’s volume. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:43 am
On July 1, 2022, U.S. [read post]
3 May 2018, 6:00 am
The difference between a BAC of .08% and .10% is often only the difference of 1-2 drinks for most adults of around average weight. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Ed. 2d 1, 113 S. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:44 pm
This means that, unless Elton John or his label permits “Rocket Man” to be reproduced, distributed or performed publicly—that includes online—anyone who does so infringes the copyright and could be liable unless the use qualifies as a fair use. [read post]
